An education about the food industry from someone with an education in the food industry.
Subscribe To Edible Intelligence.
Sunday, June 3, 2012
Nanny Nanny, Boo Boo.
First, please read NPR's story about New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's
large sugary drink ban
, then read my response.
Health is relative to the person, not relative to the food. Let me repeat that:
HEALTH IS RELATIVE TO THE PERSON, NOT RELATIVE TO THE FOOD.
Too many calories are saved as fat. Too much sugar can lead to insulin problems. I know diabetic people that drink a minimum amt of pop or even none, and I know perfectly healthy, normal, people that drink a ton of Mtn Dew. HFCS is no different than sugar, which is the whole reason coke/Pepsi are able to use it instead of cane/beet sugar.
I DO NOT support this because it's not going to work and it's too difficult to enforce. This sort of legislation is the exact sort of thing that the right cites when giving examples of left wing over-reach. It doesn't work, for one. This will amount to a tax on these drinks and we have seen that such measures do not impact levels of obesity. Why? Because people will just drink twice as much pop when they get home or eat more calories.
Another problem is how can you possibly enforce this? Are regulators going to set up
Cops In Shops
style stings? What about people from outside of the city that purchase a big drink and bring it into NYC? Will their drinks be confiscated... or dumped out as some beat cop is writing out a ticket? This is nothing but a plan to shame people, which only serves to alienate them more and keep them inside where they shouldn't be if they are already way overweight. I know my progressive friends mean well, but you are going about this the wrong way and creating a group of people even more ignorant of science who shun ANYTHING that has an industry behind it.
Links to this post
#agchat #foodchat culinaryhatchet michael pollan food inc